Can automation replace manual testing

We need humans to build and maintain the automation system and also if the system breaks down we need people to fix it. In addition, not everything could be automated. One should not get fixated with automation too much. If the testers are not skilled enough, they would in turn build a faulty automation system. This scenario of unskilled testers building an automated system would cause more harm than any help.

For example, if the testers are feeding wrong tests to automation system, the system in turn keeps executing the wrong things day-in and day-out. This in turn results in releasing a faulty, bad quality product to your customers more often. It is also essential to know when not to automate.

For example, there are many organizations still running legacy systems like mainframes and Siebel systems. Can Automation completely replace the Manual testing? The core benefit of having Automation is that it saves Time. More scenarios automated for your project gives you more coverage over manual testing. More frequent you execute and re-run your automation test suites will save more time you would have spent doing the process manually.

So new piece of code or bug fixes are deployed on your server are are ready for test. Now this testing activity consist two parts : Testing newly deployed functionality, Regression testing of existing features and defect verification plus re-testing.

Now regression testing needs to be performed frequently and on going basis, hence such scenarios can be automated. Newly released functionality can also be part of this regression automation suits for future execution. But these new features has to be tested thoroughly to make sure they matches the requirement.

For that we can not rely on Automation. At-least one round of Manual testing is must to execute all relevant test cases and to verify the behavior on the application. You need manual testing to get there. No one can deny that there are benefits of automation testing over manual testing, especially when it comes to saving time and improve test accuracy.

But it's not simply not possible to have a robust QA process by relying solely on automation. There are elements of your QA that continue to be best handled by human engineers and manual testing. Not yet—and fortunately you can enlist the help of a QA services provider like QASource to support your testing needs. Our team of experts are skilled in both manual testing and automated testing , ready to support any type of test your development cycle needs to launch to market successfully and on time.

This publication is for informational purposes only and nothing contained in it should be considered legal advice. We expressly disclaim any warranty or responsibility for damages arising out of this information and encourage you to consult with legal counsel regarding your specific needs. We do not undertake any duty to update previously posted materials. QASource Blog, for executives and managers, shares QA strategies, methodologies, and new ideas to inform and help effectively deliver quality products, websites and applications.

QASource uses cookies to optimize users' experience. Click "Agree and Proceed" button to confirm your consent to the use of cookies.

OR, by continuing to use this website, you implicitly accept the use of cookies. Find out more. QASource Blog. Quality Within the Release Cycle With the right approach, you can have quality quickly with automation testing and effectively with manual testing.

Usability Testing Still Needs Humans There are benefits of automation testing over manual testing, but the best possible results are achieved when the two are combined. Whenever possible you want humans to have the final input on: User interface testing Usability testing Installation testing Security testing User acceptance testing Essentially, any time you want to integrate form and function, you need expert human minds on the problem.

Does Automation Replace Manual Testing? Disclaimer This publication is for informational purposes only and nothing contained in it should be considered legal advice. Related Post s 29 Aug What Is Manual Regression Testing?